Never Vance
Because Vance Means Carlson and Carlson Means Candace
It’s not too early to think about 2027 and I’m not letting this go.
Tucker Carlson’s friendship with Vance is important.
The miserable, odious Candace Owens has opened a serious breach on the right, and it will have major implications for the future of the Republican party. If Vance doesn’t disengage himself from Carlson—and I personally believe he won’t, they are too close—it spells the death of the “MAGA” movement.
September 18th, with Charlie Kirk not even in the grave:
I can’t resist. Look at closeup of these two creeps faces.
Kelly’s makeup-plastered face, just at that instant:
Sheesh, yeah:
And what relevance to the late Mr. Kirk’s death does Israel’s standing in the under-30 crowd have?
Well, nothing, of course.
But the specter of Israel is dragged into the narrative because Max Blumenthal and Candace Owens want it. Then Carlson/Kelly pick it up and broadcast it like an infield of monsters, a “Sad Lexicon” of far right lunacy.
If J.D. Vance is elected president, Tucker Carlson will have a truly giant megaphone, far bigger than the one he wields today.
That’s how you create Weimar America. I don’t know who I’m voting for now, but it won’t be J.D. Vance. Never Vance.
Sadly, I can’t avoid discussing Owens’s latest descent into an even deeper pit of insanity.
She’s claiming that a staffer of TPUSA gave her and the FBI a video of the shooting from the back and there’s no blood. Which proves… the Mossad did it, or something.
I’m not going to waste time arguing over the nature of the wound—I am no analyst of these things, but I will say this.
Let’s say she actually did see this video. She’s making a big deal of nothing, just as she did with the Provo, Utah airplane. Her logic is the same as saying: “I saw someone stabbed in the chest, but from behind they looked fine, therefore they weren’t stabbed.”
It’s nonsense. Gunshot wounds are like tennis balls coming over the net: no two ever land the same way. If the bullet is still lodged in Kirk’s body, there would be no exit wound (that appears to be the case).
Then again, she could easily be lying—no one gave her anything.1
If so, catch the lie and expose it. It won’t make a difference to her or her deranged followers, but it should be noted.
She’s not just doing this for clicks and attention. That’s second nature to her now. To say that is to say nothing.
This is the real message: Telling us that she has a mole in TPUSA is saying, “I can bend this organization to my will. It’s not Charlie’s anymore. It’s mine. I can cause havoc when I so choose. TPUSA is full of people who agree with me.”
That this mole gave a crucial piece of evidence to her and to the FBI is to say, “I’m on the level of the nation’s highest federal investigative agency.”
“Not even Charlie’s lieutenants have that video. But I do.”
Evil bitch.
Warning: A Digression on Jewish Identity Follows. Please skip if you aren’t interested in this crap.
If Candace Owens has one talent, it’s recognizing the most pathological, incendiary idea, and cannibalizing it. (See note below)
If it’s someone on the alt right, she’ll go with that. (See note below)
If it’s Max Blumenthal, she’ll go with that. (See note below)
“elizabeth nickson,” the dolt whose subtarded post about Candace Owens first alerted me to this ecosystem, restacked this post, an endorsement of the original “Grayzone” libel.
Wow, I had actually misremembered. It wasn’t a rehash of Grayzone—it was a rehash/endorsement of something by Ron Unz, an unspeakable maniac, a trafficker of stuff that’s even worse than Candace Owens, in addition to referencing the Grayzone article.
I wrote a response to Nickson:
And against my better instincts, I responded in the comments to a claim the author of the piece made: “Like Unz, Blumenthal is Jewish by birth but has been critical of Israel, in particular following October 7…”
Neither is true. Blumenthal is not Jewish, and he has not been critical of Israel, particularly following October 7. He’s been a relentless, vociferous hater of Israel’s existence since… I don’t know when. Since I’ve been aware of him, and that’s long before October 7. But as to his ethnicity, I’m quite aware of the fact that he claims to be Jewish.
It’s a lie. I put that on the site, and I got into an exchange with the stupid, lazy, mendacious person who runs that Substack. I’m not putting the screenshots here but if you care to read it, the exchange is here.
I’m not the Jewish Pope and I don’t care who calls him- or herself Jewish. This is a quicksand subject, easy to get paralyzed in, and I’m not going to do that. I will simply point out red lines.
I used to think Blumenthal was kinda sorta Jewish in the watered-down American secular way. His father, Sidney Blumenthal, is Jewish. Let’s face facts, in the US, patrilineal Jewish descent is often used to flag someone as Jewish.
It’s applied inconsistently. If you like the guy, he’s a Jew. If you don’t, invoke the Halakha you otherwise don’t respect.
Paul Newman is the prime example. How many articles have there been about the late film idol, which call him a Jew? Many. And it turned out that his only identification with Judaism was negative: being an outsider. Other than that, (and Exodus), he had zero Jewish affiliations and whatever Judaism he had died with him. He was a half-Catholic Christian Scientist with an ethnically Jewish father. Rest in peace Paul, you were a great movie star, and not Jewish.
As to Blumenthal, I found out quite accidentally that his father, Sidney Blumenthal, had a Protestant mother, therefore, not a Jew, despite the Yiddische name. I have not found, nor am I going to search for, the ethnicity of his wife, Max’s mother, Jacqueline Jordan. I will simply go with the 86% chance she would be.
I really was surprised to learn this. I’d always thought that old Sid was a Yid. But he’s not. He’s even less Jewish than John Kerry.
Actually much less than John Kerry, both of whose paternal grandparents were Central European Jewish converts to Catholicism. Kerry’s father was born to baptized Catholic parents, was himself baptized into Catholicism, practiced it, and again, WAS a Catholic, no matter what Nick Fuentes or Candace Owens or the rabbis say. As is Kerry.2
Max Blumenthal is not a Jew and has no right to criticize Israel from that standpoint. Case closed.
This space is free, apart from novel-in-progress excerpts.
If you’d like to contribute, you can do so here:
Buy Me A Coffee
Support is optional, non-transactional, and non-binding.
She lies like a dead rat on Amsterdam Avenue. That is, a lot. Here is Owens lying about TPUSA’s donors.
“One of the donors said, it would be very bad for your brand … not marry a black guy from the projects or something like that.”
This reeks of bullshit. (BTW, Is the word “donors” the new “Jew?”) But why did she release “Meet My Husband, George Farmer” in December 2024 when they were married in mid-2019?
Farmer left Daily Wire in late March 2024. She then dove straight from hard right crude simplifications into crazy world.
At that point, the groyper war against Charlie Kirk was in full swing. Owens interviewed Fuentes on July 11, 2025. I am not going to watch that shit — two scorpions in a bucket would be more aesthetically appealing — but why would Owens have arranged this get-together? Fuentes called it a hit, and maybe it did devolve to sniping (like I said, I ain’t watching), but I really think she was trying to reach out to the guy who was destroying Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA.
If she has one talent, it’s seeing whatever is the most destructive thing going, and cannibalizing it.
That it turned into a bitch slapping beef was unintentional but predictable. These guys just can’t help themselves.
Kerry’s mother, a Forbes, converted from being a high church Episcopalian to Catholicism to marry the ethnically Jewish Richard Kerry. Ironic, eh?






Thank you very much for articulating this:
“Tucker Carlson’s friendship with Vance is important.” / “If Vance doesn’t disengage himself from Carlson—and I personally believe he won’t, they are too close—it spells the death knell of the “MAGA” movement.”
My thoughts exactly.
I’m ironically glad to discover that others have pondered the implications of Vance and Carlson’s association, which if continued - in the eventuality of a Vance Presidency - would go much farther than MAGA alone.
As to the motivations of bottom-feeders Carlson and Owens?
I believe that financial compensation is far (vastly) secondary to factors such as ideology and power, and an exultation in (and of) the irrational.
I'm a medical Doctor in the UK. My 13yr old (British) grand-daughter showed me a tiktok video taken by someone who was very near to Mr Kirk when the round struck him in the neck and disrupted major arteries. The force of the impact created obvious whiplash and exsanguination. The high density of vital structures in the neck and the ballistic shock would have caused secondary damage to the trachea, oesophagus, carotid and vertebral arteries, cervical spine and spinal cord, phrenic nerve and brachial plexus. I was sickened by what I witnessed and even more sickened that my grand-daughter had access to this material on her phone. However, the most sickening thing was that when I questioned her I realised that she believed that he was a bad man and she actually said, and I quote, "he had it coming..." Yet to look at her you would not believe that butter would melt in her mouth! I experienced dread and shock when I understood that this child's mind has been corrupted and polluted by evil, predatory, left wing political activists right under our noses via social media and misguided peer pressure. Apparently, all the other little boys and girls in her year group were of the same opinion. I blame the political left and entitled sanctimonious woke activists for poisoning the mind of the shooter and my beautiful little girl. She is not a monster but somehow the monsters had got inside of her and tainted her soul. I grieve for her and for Mr Kirk and his family, but unlike Mrs Kirk I will never forgive any of them, never forget & will always despise them and what they stand for. I don't blame the guns, or the mobile phones. I blame toxic ideology.